INTRODUCTION The psychodynamic approach comprises all the theories in psychology that see human’s operative based upon the interface of energies and forces within the person

The psychodynamic approach comprises all the theories in psychology that see human’s operative based upon the interface of energies and forces within the person, mostly unconscious, and between the different structures of the personality. Freud’s psychoanalysis was the original psychodynamic theory, but the psychodynamic approach as a whole contains all theories that were based on his ideas, the words psychodynamic and psychoanalytic are often confused. Remember that Freud’s theories were psychoanalytic, whereas the term ‘psychodynamic’ refers to both his theories and those of his followers. Freud’s psychoanalysis is both a theory and therapy.
Sigmund Freud (amongst the 1890s and the 1930s) established a group of theories which have designed the foundation of the psychodynamic approach to psychology. His theories are efficiently acquired – i.e., grounded on what his patients told him during therapy. The psychodynamic therapist would regularly be giving to the patient for depression or anxiety related disorders. Through his psychodynamic theory of the psyche, Sigmund Freud declared that our behaviour and the mental issues that we suffer can be sketched beyond our conscious self-control – that our subconscious mind, and the inborn instincts that we may not be aware of, are what inspires the way in which we behave. Freud was an early adopter of talking therapy, which presumes that by speaking about a problem with a psychoanalyst, a person can recognize any issues which may have happened earlier in life and in turn, overcome the existing internal conflicts of their subconscious mind. His interest was in the changing aspects of the mind – the conscious and its subconscious influences. He felt that the energy in the psyche was an endless value, and so instead of vanishing from the conscious, it would shape up in the subconscious and cause cumulative inner tension until it was addressed. For example, if something annoys you, the liveliness of your anger does not expend itself if you internalise it. Rather, it may be moved to the subconscious, and lead to a suppressed anger which you may be ignorant of on a conscious level. Freud claimed that the human psyche contained of three separate areas – the id, ego and superego – which compete against one another for control over our behaviour.
The id signifies our most thoughtless, wild needs, and pay no respect for what is suitable or sensible. Inborn characters such as the need for food, water, warmth and sexual desires originate in our id. In a sense, the id is our ‘inner child’ – it drives our natural behaviours from birth and supposes its anxieties to be met instantly, irrespective of any penalties. The id stands by the Desire Code, which declares that we seek to maximise pleasure and sidestep pain wherever possible. Also confined within the id is the death determination, a self-destructive impulsiveness which drives us to the end of our life.

The next component of the psyche is the ego, which acts as a midway between the awkward demands of the id and the outside reality. It tries to please the desires of the id as much as is virtually possible without essentially considering why some demands might be unreasonable. The ego remains self-centred and does not ponder on other people’s needs or wishes. It acts according to the Realism Attitude, which, is different from the Desire Code of the Id, takes the confines of what can be gotten from the outside world.

The final factor of our psyche is the superego. This senses concern for others and again tries to satisfy the wants of the id, but recognize that some of those wants may unfavourably touch others. It acts as a filter for our behaviour and preserves our conscience, leading to considering other people’s emotions and to demonstrative responsibility.
The utmost reproach of the psychodynamic approach is that it is irrational in its examination of human behaviour. Many of the perceptions central to Freud’s theories are independent, and as such, tough to exam technically. For example, how is it conceivable to scientifically study perceptions like the unconscious mind or the triple personality? In this reverence, it could be claimed that the psychodynamic viewpoint is confirmable as its theories cannot be empirically examined. However, cognitive psychology has recognized unconscious procedures, such as procedural memory (Tulving, 1972), automatic processing (Bargh ; Chartrand, 1999; Stroop, 1935), and social psychology have revealed the position of implied processing (Greenwald ; Banaji, 1995). Such experimental results have established the character of unconscious processes in human behaviour.
Kline (1989) claims that psychodynamic theory contains a sequence of hypotheses, some of which are more simply verified than others, and some with more subsidiary evidence than others. Also, while the theories of the psychodynamic approach may not be effortlessly verified, this does not mean that it does not have solid descriptive control. However, most of the proves for psychodynamic theories is interpreted from Freud’s case studies. The core situation now is that the case studies are supported on reviewing one individual in detail, and with input to Freud, the persons in question are most often his patients. This makes inductive reasoning to the whole world tough. Other tricks with the case study technique is that it is inclined to scientist favouritism. review of Freud’s own scientific effort advises that he occasionally one-sided his patients’ case antiquities to ‘fit’ with his theory (Sulloway, 1991). The humanistic approach makes the reproach that the psychodynamic viewpoint is too settled. Freud proposes that all views, characters and reactions are resolute by our infant understandings and unconscious psychological procedures. This is dimness because it recommends, we have no conscious power over our actions, parting slight room for the knowledge of own action.

Oprah Winfrey, the wealthiest African American of the 20th era, was born in Kosciusko, Mississippi in 1958, on 29th of January. She is recognized as the most self-made American television fabricator, host and humanitarian and is among the utmost powerful women in the universe. She did not have a hopeful infancy and had to experience a diversity of poverties in her adolescent life. After her parents’ parting, she was referred to her grandparents, to live in so much lack. Some say that she used to dress on clothes made of potato sack. She united with her mother at the age of 6 who relocated with her to Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Her mother spent her all day out employed as a maid at homes and had no time for petite Winfrey. At the age of nine, as she says, she was raped by her cousin, her uncle and a family friend. When she could not take it anymore, she flees away from her home at the age of 13 and had a child at 14. After her son’s demise in embryonic stage, she went back to live with her hair stylist father in Tennessee. This was the first time, as she recollects, she that she studied extremely hard and attained an honours student. Her devotion shortly was rewarded and she turn out to be the most popular student at East Nashville High School and gained numerous honors in open speech competition. Later, she went to study communication from Tennessee State University.
At the age of 19, her life was turned around when she was employed at a local Radio Station as a co-anchor for the local evening news. In 1984, she underway to host ‘AM Chicago’, an early morning talk show where she shared her story and used it to motivate other women who had similar experience with her, which later most watched show in America. Later, it was retitled as ‘The Oprah Winfrey Show’. The combined talk show turns out to be the most widespread show in the Television antiquity with over 30 million American audiences and traversed across 144 nations international. She has also shown herself as the greatest significant spiritual frontrunner through ‘Change Your Life TV’ with 22 million feminine spectators.
Apart from being a TV host and producer, she is the co-founder of Oxygen Media and initiator of Oprah Magazine. In 1998, she began a contribution named “Oprah’s Angel Network” for which she handles all organizational costs. She is recognized as the 32nd most humanitarian person in the universe. In 2005, Business Week recruited her name amongst 50 most substantial humanitarians for her involvement which was comparable to $303 million dollars. As said by Forbes of 2009, her valuable is $2.7 billion dollar.

McLeod, S. A. (2017). Psychodynamic approach. Retrieved from
Adler, A. (1927). Understanding human nature. New York: Greenburg.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American psychologist, 54(7), 462.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Freud, A. (1936). Ego & the mechanisms of defense.
Freud, S., & Breuer. J. (1895). Studies on hysteria. In Standard edition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–335).
Freud, S. (1896). Heredity and the etiology of the neuroses. In Standard edition (Vol. 3, pp. 142–156).
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. In Standard edition (Vols. 4 & 5, pp. 1–627).
Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In Standard edition (Vol. 10, pp. 153–249).
Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306.
Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. SE, 14: 159-204.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4.
Jung, C. G. (1907). Ueber die Psychologie der Dementia praecox. Psychological Bulletin, 4(6), 196-197.
Jung, C. G. (1912). Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido: Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Denkens. F. Deuticke.
Jung, C. G., et al. (1964). Man and his Symbols, New York, N.Y.: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
Kline, P. (1989). Objective tests of Freud’s theories. Psychology Survey, 7, 127-45.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643.
Sulloway, F. J. (1991). Reassessing Freud’s case histories: The social construction of psychoanalysis. Isis, 82(2), 245-275.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory, (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, T. D. (2004). Strangers to ourselves. Harvard University Press